|
Measuring two specific chemicals contained in spinal fluid may
help doctors accurately diagnose Alzheimer's disease, according
to a study reported in the September issue of the Archives of
Neurology.
The current
process used to diagnose Alzheimer disease is both time-consuming
and costly, depending primarily on the judgment of physicians
and requiring neurological examinations, neuropsychological testing,
neuroimaging and blood tests. However, the accuracy rate in diagnosing
this disease is still only 80 to 90 percent.
Realizing
that biochemical tests could direct physicians rapidly to the correct diagnosis,
a team of Swiss researchers measured the amount of two chemicals known as phosphorylated
tau protein and beta-amyloid peptide42 in the spinal fluid of 100 patients referred
to a specialty dementia clinic and 31 healthy patients who served as controls.
The researchers
found that that the ratio of the two spinal fluid chemicals was
significantly increased in patients with Alzheimer's disease enabling
them to accurately distinguish patients with Alzheimer's disease
from healthy control subjects.
"We
found that calculation of the ratio of phosphorylated tau protein to beta-amyloid
peptide42 resulted in high diagnostic accuracy and may, therefore, constitute
a diagnostic tool that is suitable for routine clinical use," concluded the
researchers.
However, the
researchers said it is probably unrealistic to expect diagnostic
accuracy levels above 90 percent by measuring amyloid peptides
and tau proteins alone since a variety of additional lesions,
such as infarcts, gliosis, argyrophilic grains and Lewy bodies,
are evident in the brains of Alzheimer's patients analyzed after
their deaths.
"In
the future, a biochemical marker pattern reflecting the whole spectrum of abnormal
proteins deposited in the brain will most likely provide a more accurate diagnosis
of Alzheimer's disease, comparable with the current criteria for the neuropathological
classification," added the researchers.
Other
sources: Archives of Neurology 2003;60:1202-1206
|